This really is specialized in individuals which invest in individual stocks. I has shared with you the techniques I have tried personally over the years to choose stocks i have found to become consistently profitable in actual trading. I like to utilize a mixture of fundamental and technical analysis for choosing stocks. My experience has demonstrated that successful stock selection involves two steps:
1. Select a regular while using the fundamental analysis presented then
2. Confirm the stock is surely an uptrend as shown by the 50-Day Exponential Moving Average Line (EMA) being higher than the 100-Day EMA
This two-step process increases the odds the stock you decide on will be profitable. It even offers a signal to market Automatic Income Method which includes not performed as expected if it’s 50-Day EMA drops below its 100-Day EMA. It is also a useful means for selecting stocks for covered call writing, a different type of strategy.
Fundamental Analysis
Fundamental analysis is the study of financial data like earnings, dividends and your money flow, which influence the pricing of securities. I use fundamental analysis to help select securities for future price appreciation. Over recent years I have tried personally many strategies to measuring a company’s rate of growth so as to predict its stock’s future price performance. I purchased methods like earnings growth and return on equity. I have found these methods are certainly not always reliable or predictive.
Earning Growth
For example, corporate net income is be subject to vague bookkeeping practices like depreciation, income, inventory adjustment and reserves. These are typical be subject to interpretation by accountants. Today as part of your, corporations they are under increasing pressure to overpower analyst’s earnings estimates which leads to more aggressive accounting interpretations. Some corporations take special “one time” write-offs on his or her balance sheet for things such as failed mergers or acquisitions, restructuring, unprofitable divisions, failed product, etc. Many times these write-offs are certainly not reflected as being a continue earnings growth but instead show up as being a footnote on the financial report. These “one time” write-offs occur with an increase of frequency than you might expect. Many businesses that form the Dow Jones Industrial Average took such write-offs.
Return on Equity
One other indicator, which I have found just isn’t necessarily predictive of stock price appreciation, is return on equity (ROE). Conventional wisdom correlates an increased return on equity with successful corporate management that is maximizing shareholder value (the better the ROE better).
Which company is a lot more successful?
Coca-Cola (KO) using a Return on Equity of 46% or
Merrill Lynch (MER) using a Return on Equity of 18%
The answer then is Merrill Lynch by measure. But Coca-Cola carries a greater ROE. How are these claims possible?
Return on equity is calculated by dividing a company’s net gain by stockholder’s equity. Coca-Cola is so over valued that it is stockholder’s equity is only corresponding to about 5% in the total market price in the company. The stockholder equity is so small that nearly any amount of net gain will produce a favorable ROE.
Merrill Lynch however, has stockholder’s equity corresponding to 42% in the market price in the company and requirements a greater net gain figure to make a comparable ROE. My point is always that ROE will not compare apples to apples then isn’t a good relative indicator in comparing company performance.
More info about Automatic Income Method go this useful resource: look at this